Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction provides an overview of the main themes of Samir Okasha, author Lecturer in Philosophy, University of York. Buy Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) First Edition by Samir Okasha (ISBN: ) from Amazon’s Book. Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction by Samir Okasha, , available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide.

Author: Akitaur Mujind
Country: Senegal
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Finance
Published (Last): 27 February 2016
Pages: 427
PDF File Size: 19.61 Mb
ePub File Size: 13.11 Mb
ISBN: 558-4-24652-247-4
Downloads: 87110
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gabar

To ask other readers questions about Philosophy of Sciencescifnce sign up. Even two mass-produced factory goods will normally differ in innumerable ways, even if the differences cannot be detected with the naked eye. I suppose understanding the psychological and social underpinnings of science can lead to ibtroduction less idealistic and simplistic view of how science works.

The use and power of inference to the best explanation reasoning. As an overview for a non-philosopher, this book was good. Some philosophical topics even at its most basic can be difficult to comprehend and will require repeat readings. How much faith should we introduciton in what scientists tell us? Is there a real difference between science and myth? All chapters made sense to me and relate to the subject. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide.

Csience who bought this also bought. The fundamentals of induction, explanation, realism and scientific change are all explained intelligibly, arguments are presented with corresponding counterarguments, and where necessary, topics are introduced with the right amount of background information – for example, the debate between scientific realism and anti-realism begins with a summary of the older, more metaphysical debate between realism and idealism; the chapter on scientific reasoning begins with an exploration of the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning, and so on.

To be falsifiable is simply to have the feature that it is at least possible in sciece to show the theory to be false with some observation.

The final chapter is devoted to ihtroduction much-needed discussion of the various criticisms often aimed at science, including that old chestnut, scientism. The difference between science and pseudo-science. Some, on the other hand, think that the mind and brain contain areas of specialization i.


The Magic of Reality Richard Dawkins. He covers a wide array of topics pertaining to the philosophy of science but he does not remain on the surface while talking about each. View all 16 comments. Okasha used different arguments in different fields of science in order to explain different facets of this amazing field. Good book, though they could introductiln better served the aim of informing the reader about the purpose of philosophy of science if they translated the reasons for rejecting arguments into speech more accessible to laypeople.

It certainly is not easy to find an example of two distinct objects that share all their attributes.

Philosophy of Science: Very Short Introduction

Some was old hat, too. Okasha clearly explains the basic framework of this type of explanation, and then offers a couple of classic problems with the view. Strong evidence is presented for both sides, one of the most interesting for modularity being a simple line drawing with arrowheads, the arrowheads are then inverted with scuence line length remaining the same. Nonetheless, the book gave a good introduction into the subject which, most importantly, let you feel more interested into the subject after going through t The book was overall good and sometimes great!

Mar 02, Book rated it really liked it Shelves: He has published numerous articles in philosophy journals, in the areas of philosophy of science, philosophy of biology, and epistemology.

Wouldn’t necessarily recommend to anyone unless they’re already interested in science, philosophy, or critical theory. PII is intuitively quite compelling.

Very Short Introduction Second Edition Samir Okasha Very Short Introductions Looks at both the historical and contemporary challenges of the philosophy of science, considering core debates such as the two opposing schools of thought of realism and idealism Olasha key questions such as the issue of scientific change, and whether there is a discernible pattern to the way scientific ideas change over time Investigates fascinating ethical and philosophical questions across a variety of scientific fields including physics, biology and psychology Discusses the controversial “science wars” Part of the Very Short Introductions series – millions of copies sold worldwide.

Thought-provoking insights from Hume.

He also looks at philosophical issues in particular sciences, including the problem of classification in biology, and the nature of space and time in physics.


This Very Short Introduction provides a concise overview of the main themes of contemporary philosophy of science. Mar 20, Per-Yngve Ingensson rated it really liked it.

Professor of Philosophy of Science, Samir Okasha embarks upon a brief tour that addresses questions concerning assumptions that scientists take for granted. Ergo, if you’re a science student, who hasn’t taken a philosophy course, you may like this book. Still, I think realism is the way to go. Lastly, he talks about the controversial idea that science is value-free, and explains why some observers have charged that scientific inquiry and practice is a value-laden affair.

Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction

Understanding the Causes of Our expert authors combine facts, analysis, perspective, new ideas, and enthusiasm to make interesting and challenging topics highly readable. The range of topics dealt with is nice, but, as another reviewer said, I had a sense of uneven coverage. Is there any objective existence of the physical world independent of our pilosophy this I always pondered? I’ve also gotten more familiar with logical positivism and I can see why it was in some sense attractive for a long time For example, though we all trust induction, this chapter clearly explains David Hume’s famous problem of induction, which showed that there is no rational way to justify induction itself.

Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction by Samir Okasha

Science and its critics Further reading Index. Table of contents 1. If this book doesn’t provide the joy of thinking, nothing will! Notwithstanding all its limitations, science is still the best thing we have.

Next he gives the classic argument for anti-realism and the realist’s response. Caution is advised before pronouncing any theory as absolute truth, but at the same time it is nonsense to dismiss a theory because it doesn’t explain every tiny detail critics of evolution, take og The Sokal Hoax Lingua Franca.

He does as best a introdjction being objective in his approach as possible, so I tip my hat to him.