The Indian Evidence Act, originally passed in India by the Imperial Legislative Council in , during the British Raj, contains a set of rules and allied issues. THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT in India Bare Acts, Banking and Insurance, Business and Corporate, Constitutional, Consumer Laws, Criminal Law, Energy, . Indian Evidence Act, (Act no. 1 of ) Act requires in oral evidence that person who has actually perceived something by that sense by which it is.

Author: Akishura Akisida
Country: Pakistan
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Marketing
Published (Last): 4 February 2006
Pages: 458
PDF File Size: 3.7 Mb
ePub File Size: 5.84 Mb
ISBN: 400-7-53525-114-1
Downloads: 71556
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Faugami

Presumption as to electronic messages. Section15 – Facts bearing on question whether act was accidental or intentional.

Section28 – Confession made after removal of impression caused by inducement, threat or promise relevant. Relevancy of entry in public record made in performance of duty. Section34 – Entries in books of account including those maintained in an electronic form when relevant.

Section20 – Admissions by persons expressly referred to by party to suit. If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT Indian Bare Acts – India Bare Act – Law Firm Lawyers India

When facts not otherwise relevant become relevant. Section – Testimony to facts stated in document mentioned in section Confession made after removal of impression caused by inducement, threat or promise, relevant. Constable’s Guide,pp. The danger of fabrication and lack of opportunity for cross-examination is no doubt, there, to some extent.

Indian Evidence Act

Opinion as to handwriting, when relevant. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Ridgway, 10 East see infra. Section88A – Presumption as to electronic messages. Articles needing additional references from November All articles needing additional references Use 11872 English from June All Wikipedia articles written in Indian English Use dmy dates from July Articles that may contain original research from October All articles that may contain original research Articles needing additional references from July The section has used the expression “in reference to”.


The leading case based on such a reasoning is a Bombay one Ningava v. Section – Question not to be asked without reasonable grounds. Things said or done by conspirator in reference to common design. SectionA – Presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman.


Russell, LT [this point was not discussed in the appellate courts; see ACaft. Part 1 deals with relevancy bade the facts. To render any document admissible in evidence as an official register in England, it must be one which the law requires to be kept for public benefit.

Proof of admissions against persons making them, and by or on their behalf. Section – Questions lawful in cross-examination. In extraordinary situations, the scope for a wider view does, not appear to be ruled out. As Evidenfe had mentioned in my letter forwarding the last Report 68th Report-Powers-of-Attorney Actrevision of the Evidence Act was an arduous task, but the Commission has done its best to examine its provisions in depth and has made recommendations for amendment which the Commission thinks it is necessary to make in some of them.

Oral evidence must be direct. In order to show A’s intent, the fact of A’s having previously shot at B may be proved. Section14 – Facts showing existence of state of mind, or of body or bodily feeling. After the Act was passed insome new juristic principles have been evolved and have received acceptance from the jurists and these have been kept in view by the Commission indiian making some of its recommendations.

In this case, we have recommended certain amendments which, we think, will hold the scales even between the rights of citizens to lay before the courts all factual material relevant to the issues in a pending judicial proceeding against the Government and the legitimate considerations of evudence of the State.

Burden of proof as to ownership.

Georgia, ; US When they may be asked. Relevancy of facts forming part of same transaction. I am happy to note that you agree with the suggestion which I have been repeatedly making for some time past that the Commission’s reports should be printed as early as possible and circulated to all academic bodies like the Bar Associations in the whole of India, the Judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts, the Bar Council of India and the State Bar Councils, and other institutions ,interested in the study of law.


Bharmappa, ILR 23 Born Section97 – Evidence as to application of language to one of two sets of facts, to neither of which the whole correctly applies. Jndian – Presumption as to documents thirty years old. Except for these points, the recommendations made by the Commission are unanimous and that, in my view, can well be regarded as a distinctive feature of the Inidan when the subject-matter under examination raised some issues which were complex, complicated and difficult and needed an elaborate discussion during the course of our study.

In regard to sections 23 and 68, my colleague Mr. Shopbop Designer Fashion Brands. This is the round for departure from the general rule against hearsay. In consequence, the present Report has become an extensive document and it spreads over more than two thousand pages. Estoppel of acceptor of bill of exchange, bailee or licensee. Pierce, US Section67 – Proof of signature and handwriting of person alleged to have signed or written document baree. Whereas it is expedient to consolidate, define and amend the law of Evidence.