Wiki for Collaborative Studies of Arts, Media and Humanities. Echographies of Television has 42 ratings and 3 reviews. In this important new book, Jacques Derrida talks with BernardStiegler about the effect of telet. Echographies of Television Filmed Interviews. Jacques Derrida – Wiley. Epimetheus Bound: Stiegler on Derrida, Life, and the Technological Condition.
|Published (Last):||27 March 2015|
|PDF File Size:||16.24 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.25 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Table of contents Reviews Features List of Illustrations. This article relies too much on references to primary sources. Articles with disproportional geographic scope from August Articles lacking reliable references from August All articles lacking reliable references Wikipedia articles needing clarification from August All Wikipedia articles needing clarification Articles with multiple maintenance issues Articles containing French-language text CS1 maint: No eBook available Amazon.
Jacques Derrida & Bernard Stiegler, Echographies of Television Filmed Interviews – PhilPapers
Analogico-digital technology is one such moment, in which what is undergoing an intense evolution are the conditions by which we perceive and, therefore, the conditions by which we believe. No trivia or quizzes yet. This article has no associated abstract. David rated it it was amazing Feb 09, Chapter 6 The Archive Market: Please help us clarify the article.
This page was last edited on 29 Juneat This is in contrast to derrlda way in which Hollywood has taken up these changes: Account Options Sign in.
Indeed, deconstruction is relentless in this pursuit since justice is impossible to achieve. Christopher Morris – – Derrida Today 6 1: But if there has never been an image-object without a mental image, echograpbies so, there has never been a mental image which is not, in some way, the return of an image-object.
It is a matter of understanding that what comes back is on the one hand what must od fought against, and on the other hand irreducible, originary, and necessary.
Echographies of Television: Filmed Interviews
In this sense, it is a question of more than simply the elaboration of critiques. Putting It Up for Sale. John rated it really liked it Sep 25, The book opens with a shorter interview with Derrida on the news media, and closes with a provocative essay by Stiegler on the epistemology of digital photography. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. As Derrida and Stiegler discuss the role of teletechnologies inmodern society, the political implications of Derrida’s thoughtbecome apparent.
This article has multiple issues.
There might be a discussion about this on the talk page. It remains necessary, Derrida argues, to take up the battle fought by Enlightenment philosophy against the “return of the worst”. At the same time, however, there is no way for the viewer to know what aspects of the photo are actual records of a photographic event, and which parts have been altered, added, or subtracted, in a way completely disconnected from the photographic process.
Paperbackpages. He therefore asks Derrida if the problem today is that the selection criteria are overdetermined by televison “commercial character of industry,” and thus if when Derrida speaks of a ” politics of memory ,” he is talking about regulating the effects of market pressure on the construction of actuality.
History of Western Philosophy. It is the history and evolution of writing that made possible the critical and logical spirit which we attribute to language, and which we have until now not attributed to the apprehension of the image.
Trivia About Echographies of T The production and realisation of images by an artist or filmmaker is a form of analysis, which treats images as discrete elements to be edited and assembled. The ability to do so derives from the fact that even the analog photo is a technical synthesis, and as such exposed to an irreducible potential for falsification. As Derrida and Stiegler discuss the role of teletechnologies inmodern society, the political implications of Derrida’s thoughtbecome apparent.
Laurie Johnson – – Derrida Today 2 2: Feliz Lucia Molina rated it it was amazing Jul 02, Uses editors parameter link Derrida, Jacques ; Stiegler, Bernardeds. One must, on the one hand, take one’s time, hold back, defer, while, on the other hand, one must rush into things headlong, urgently—one must be both hyperactual and anachronistic. Matthias Fritsch – – Derrida Today 4 2: Just as Derrida showed that there is no transcendental signified no meaning which can be shown to precede its inscription in a signifier, so too there is no “transcendental imagery” which precedes the image-object.
My library Help Advanced Book Search. Improvising before a camera, the twophilosophers are confronted by the very technologies they discussand so are forced to address all the more directly Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy.
We must decide, and we can only decide, on the basis of what we inherit, but these decisions are also the transformation of what we inherit, and therefore always also involve invention.
That we experience the progression of images in film as a continuous movement is less the result of retinal persistence than it is of the spectator’s expectationswhich work to efface the editing. Bernard Leconte – Find it on Scholar. But with digital technology it becomes possible not only to produce cinematic or televisual works in a new way, but to analyse and therefore interpret these in a new way—for example, to index images, camera movements, voices, etc.
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. With the digital photo, this chain is broken, or decomposed: Great moments of technical innovation “suspend” a situation which previously appeared stable, and impose a new situation.
Please improve this by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Gabriele Girolamini rated it it was ok Mar 08, Stiegler describes grammatisation as follows: Television and the Moral Imaginary: